[tin-dev] full screen width in raw-mode?
Urs Janßen
urs at tin.org
Thu Aug 10 00:05:21 CEST 2023
On Wed, 09 Aug 2023 22:56:17 Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> I wonder why we have -1 here (for years) and if the following would have
>> any unwanted side effects?
>
> it does - the "-1" is to work around differences in terminal wrapping.
>
> DEC vt100 and compatible terminals will leave the cursor on the right
> margin when writing a printable character (counting space), and ignore
> newline, tab, written at that point. Another printable character will
> make it wrap.
>
> Some other terminals don't do that.
>
> In terminfo(5), that's
>
> eat_newline_glitch xenl xn newline ignored af‐
> ter 80 cols (con‐
> cept)
>
> (I recall explaining this a while back, but it's probably quite a while)
thanks, so I'll leave the code as it but add a comment about the -1.
just to avoid asking the same question in ~2046 again ,-)
More information about the tin-dev
mailing list