[tin-dev] [tin 2.4.3] snapshots - please test

[Urs Janßen]

In <mailman.173.1530633342.592.tin-dev at tin.org>, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> | o  add check for ICU unorm2.h/unorm2_normalize(); prefer it over
>> |    ICU unorm.h/unorm_normalize()
>> volunteers? ,-)
> 
> Hmm, the call has changed significantly.  Not that easy...

that's why it's still on the todo list ,-)

>> > pcre/pcre_study.c:419:35: warning: ‘<<’ in boolean context, did you mean ‘<’ ? [-Wint-in-bool-context]
>> >              if ((tcode[c/8] && (1 << (c&7))) != 0)
>> >                                 ~~~^~~~~~~~~
>> > The && looks wrong.  In the equivalent piece of code in upstream
>> > pcre-8.42 this reads:
>> > 
>> >              if ((map[c/8] & (1 << (c&7))) != 0)

btw. that one was fixed in pcre-8.10

>> the included pcre source is very outdated (> 10 years old now) and should
>> either be updated or dropped (at least any system wide installed version
>> should be preferred).
> Dropping the included pcre would be preferrable, otherwise you get

I'd like to see the current pcre-8.x included instead - pcre-8 is
feature complete and only gets bug fixes...

"replacing" the shipped pcre-7.0 with pcre-8.current is mainly
autoconf rework - not exactly my forte.