[tin-dev] -C and timeout with low nntp_read_timeout_secs and huge group

[Dennis Preiser]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 06:09:40PM +0200, Dennis Preiser wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 07:16:26AM +0200, Urs Janßen wrote:
>> In <mailman.1672.1689718883.1791.tin-dev at tin.org> on Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:21:21,
>> Urs Janßen wrote:
>>> does something like this make any sense?
>> 
>> this documents the problem with -C (in batch mode) and keeps the current
>> behavior for uncompressed connections and compressed batch mode. comments?
> 
> I think the prompt is an improvement. Unfortunately, with 'N' txt_group
> is gone afterwards and the screen is completely empty. (In the example
> with news.gmane.io.)
> 
> Dennis

Maybe something like this will be enough:

--- signal.c	2023-07-19 17:42:09
+++ signal.c	2023-07-19 18:19:21
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ signal_handler(
 #	ifdef USE_ZLIB
 			else {
 				RESTORE_HANDLER(sig, signal_handler);
+				wait_message(0, "Continuing...");
 			}
 #	endif /* USE_ZLIB */
 			return;

Dennis